Do you think than these punishments were sufficient for the heinous crimes done against minors? Comment your opinion and start a discussion.
When a Couple Turned Rape into Business: Full Analysis of Child Porn Case (Gujarat HC, 2010): Part 2
Part 1 Thrilling Story of crime: The Secret Operation of A1 and A2 The heart of this criminal enterprise was a flat in Permeshawar Park Society, Ahmedabad, where Accused No. 1 (A1) and Accused No. 2 (A2) resided between 1988 and 1992. A1 and A2, a husband and wife, ran a clandestine operation involving sexual […]
When a Couple Turned Rape into Business: Full Analysis of Child Porn Case (Gujarat HC, 2010): Part 1
It must be noted that, to be a culprit of such heinous crime, destroying lives of minors and killing their souls, Court initiated a Sou Moto Appeal to enhance the sentence of A2, i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.443 of 2005.
Obscene video of Mansya Kalan, District Hathras: Part 2
Thus finally 4 accused boys were sentenced for one and half year of RI due to concurrent sentence. Final fine to be paid was sum of Rs. 56,500 (Fifty Six Thousand Five Hundred) by each sentenced accused. This sum shall be deposited in the respective court within three months from the date of judgment and half of the amount shall be given to victim as compensation.
संविधान सभा की बैठक – 9.12.1946 भाग 1
[1] Constituent Assembly Of India Debates (Proceedings)- Volume I Dt. 9.12.1946 [2] भारत में ब्रिटीश साम्राज्य का प्रभाव और उपनिवेशवाद, कौशल सिंह भाटी, November – December 2024 IJIRMPS | ISSN: 2349-7300, Volume 12 Issue 6 [3] Constituent Assembly Of India Debates (Proceedings)- Volume I Dt. 9.12.1946 [4] Ibid
AMASRA: 2.64 Section 39. Repeals and savings.
2.64 Repeals and savings 2.64.1 Bare Act Provision: 39. Repeals and savings.―(1) The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), and section 126 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (37 of 1956), are hereby repealed. (2) The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 (7 of […]
AMASRA: 2.62 Section 37. Protection of action taken under the Act.
2.62 Protection of action taken under the Act 2.62.1 Bare Act Provision: 37. Protection of action taken under the Act.―No suit for compensation and no criminal proceeding shall lie against any public servant in respect of any act done or in good faith intended to be done in the exercise of any power conferred by […]
AMASRA: 2.61 Section 36. Power to correct mistakes, etc.
2.61 Power to correct mistakes, etc 2.61.1 Bare Act Provision: 36. Power to correct mistakes, etc.―Any clerical mistake, patent error or error arising from accidental slip or omission in the description of any ancient monument or archaeological site and remains declared to be of national importance by or under this Act may, at any […]
AMASRA: 2.58 Section 35. Ancient monuments, etc., which have ceased to be of national importance.
2.58 Ancient monuments, etc., which have ceased to be of national importance: 2.58.1 Bare Act Provision: 35. Ancient monuments, etc., which have ceased to be of national importance.―If the Central Government is of opinion that any ancient and historical monument or archaeological site and remains declared to be of national importance by or under this […]