Monitoring under the UGC Equity Regulations 2026:

The UGC is required to form a high-level national committee to oversee everything. This committee will be made up of representatives from various professional councils, government commissions, and members of civil society. Their job is not just to check if the rules are being followed, but also to study the broader issues of discrimination in higher education and recommend new ways to prevent it. This committee must meet at least twice every year to discuss their findings and progress. What is the use of such discussion, when it will not gain any fruit of unity of Indian society? Continue reading …..

Appeal under the UGC Equity Regulations 2026:

When an amicus curiae is appointed to help with the appeal process, they are entitled to a reasonable fee for their services. This section clarifies that the responsibility for paying this fee lies with the Higher Education Institution (HEI) itself. This ensures that the cost of expert legal assistance does not fall on the student or the person filing the appeal. Continue reading …..

The procedure in case of an incident of discrimination under UGC Equity Regulations 2026

The EOC Coordinator will chair the Equity Committee meeting instead, and the final investigation report will be sent to the person’s boss or the next higher governing authority, like the Chancellor or the Ministry. If head of HEI is from general category, then to remove him from post, rival staff or faculty member may misuse these regulations and influence students from deprave classes in exchange of marks or other benefits. Continue reading …..

Equal Opportunity Centre under UGC Equity Regulations 2026: Part 1

Mandatory Establishment and Scope Regulation no. 5(1) provides for the mandatory establishment of equal opportunity centre (EOC) in every HEI. 5. Equal Opportunity Centre: (1) Every HEI shall establish an Equal Opportunity Centre to oversee the effective implementation of policies and programmes for disadvantaged groups; Continue reading …..

Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991: An Analytical Study

Welcome to Index page of the book/article series of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991: An Analytical Study. To read this analytical study just click on the title of the article and start reading. Comment your opinion about this law. Preface and Forward: The Continue reading …..

Secular Preservation or Historical Injustice? Debating the Places of Worship Act 1991

The conflict between the right to religion and the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, in Bharat centers around the balance between preserving peace and communal harmony and upholding constitutional rights to religious freedom. Continue reading …..

Places of Worship Act: Conflict with Constitutional Rights and Secularism

3.2 Conflict with Constitutional Provisions: Secularism and Communal Harmony: The Supreme Court, while deciding the Ayodhya dispute, made significant observations about the Act. It upheld the Act as a legislative measure to maintain secularism and communal harmony, emphasizing that “the Places of Worship Act imposes Continue reading …..