Article 51A(f): Constitutional Duty to Protect India’s Heritage
Clause (f) of Article 51A of the Bhartiya Constitution stipulates that it is the duty of every citizen of Bharat to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.
Legal Research and Reform for Better India
Clause (f) of Article 51A of the Bhartiya Constitution stipulates that it is the duty of every citizen of Bharat to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.
1.4 Secular Fabric of the Nation: Bharat is so diverse that to govern this state without damaging its unity in diversity, secular laws are required. Hence our Constitution declares State as Secular. To maintain the diversity of the society, we are having many statutory provisions.
1.3 Cultural Preservation and Protection: 1.3.1 Right to Protect Cultural Heritage and Values under Constitution of Bharat: The right to protect cultural heritage has indeed evolved under Article 21 of the Constitution of Bharat, which guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Throughout the
The right to religion, particularly in the context of Bhartiya jurisprudence as outlined by various cases, manifests primarily as a civil right within the legal framework.
Right To Religion in Bharat: Before going further in the topic of temples and their jurisprudence, first of all one should know the Right to Religion in Bharat. So let us try to understand Right to Religion under Constitution of Bharat, 1950 in brief. The
As we navigate through the chapters, let us remember that history, while immutable, teaches us lessons that can guide us towards a more equitable future.
The Supreme Court has stayed the Bombay High Court order regarding the Tulja Bhavani temple fund misappropriation. Explore the current legal status, relevant constitutional laws, and why establishing a unified Devasthan Federation is crucial to protect Hindu temple assets and safeguard cultural heritage from future mismanagement.
Paragraph 10 of the judgment of High Court notes that on June 15, 2022, the Home Department issued a communication to the Director General of Police deciding not to conduct a departmental inquiry or pursue further criminal action.