Legal Research and Reform for Better India
Explore the arguments and final verdict in FCI vs Jagdish Balaram Bahira Part 2. Discover why the Supreme Court rejected equitable protection and ruled that jobs secured with fake caste certificates are void ab initio under statutory law.
Discover the landmark 2017 Supreme Court ruling in FCI vs Jagdish Balaram Bahira. Learn how the court addressed the misuse of invalidated caste certificates to secure government jobs and educational seats meant for genuine Scheduled Tribe candidates.
Welcome to Index page of the book/article series of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991: An Analytical Study. To read this analytical study just click on the title of the article and start reading. Comment your opinion about this law. Preface and Forward: The
Provision of Article 49 Provision of Article 49 reads as follows: 49. Protection of monuments and places and objects of national importance It shall be the obligation of the State to protect every monument or place or object of artistic or historic interests,declared by or
The Act’s application has sparked significant debate, particularly in cases like the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Idgah in Mathura.
Clause (f) of Article 51A of the Bhartiya Constitution stipulates that it is the duty of every citizen of Bharat to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture.
1.4 Secular Fabric of the Nation: Bharat is so diverse that to govern this state without damaging its unity in diversity, secular laws are required. Hence our Constitution declares State as Secular. To maintain the diversity of the society, we are having many statutory provisions.
1.3 Cultural Preservation and Protection: 1.3.1 Right to Protect Cultural Heritage and Values under Constitution of Bharat: The right to protect cultural heritage has indeed evolved under Article 21 of the Constitution of Bharat, which guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Throughout the