Tag: Criminal Law

बीएनएसएस  की पहली धारा कानून को औपचारिक रूप देती है। यह बताती है कि इस संहिता का नाम भारतीय नागरिक सुरक्षा संहिता, 2023 है। यह संहिता जम्मू-कश्मीर सहित पूरे भारत पर लागू होती है। पर इस संहिता के अध्याय 9, 11 और 12 के प्रावधान और उससे जुड़े अन्य प्रावधान पूरे नागालैंड और आसाम के उन जनजातीय क्षेत्रों मे लागू नहीं होंगे जिनका समावेश संविधान की छठी सूची के पैरा 20 मे दि. 21 जनवरी 1972 के ठीक पहले किया गया था।

१. परिवर्तन की अनिवार्यता और वर्तमान विमर्श भारत की आपराधिक न्याय प्रणाली में भारतीय नागरिक सुरक्षा संहिता, 2023 (बीएनएसएस) का आगमन एक ऐतिहासिक मोड़ है। यह संहिता, दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, 1973 (सीआरपीसी) का स्थान लेती है, जो स्वयं ब्रिटिश भारत में अधिनियमित ‘कोड ऑफ क्रिमिनल प्रोसीजर, 1898’ की पुनरावृत्ति थी। यह पुस्तक इसी मौलिक वैधानिक […]

Do you think than these punishments were sufficient for the heinous crimes done against minors? Comment your opinion and start a discussion.

Do you think than these punishments were sufficient for the heinous crimes done against minors? Comment your opinion and start a discussion.

Part 1 Part 2 Document Evidence: High Court observed the photographs and found that all the photographs are not only nude photographs, but they are also dirty nude photographs, exposing various types of perversity. They are of various unnatural activities, which are prohibited by the provisions of Section 377 of IPC. The evidence shows that […]

Part 1 Thrilling Story of crime: The Secret Operation of A1 and A2 The heart of this criminal enterprise was a flat in Permeshawar Park Society, Ahmedabad, where Accused No. 1 (A1) and Accused No. 2 (A2) resided between 1988 and 1992. A1 and A2, a husband and wife, ran a clandestine operation involving sexual […]

Part 1 Thrilling Story of crime: The Secret Operation of A1 and A2 The heart of this criminal enterprise was a flat in Permeshawar Park Society, Ahmedabad, where Accused No. 1 (A1) and Accused No. 2 (A2) resided between 1988 and 1992. A1 and A2, a husband and wife, ran a clandestine operation involving sexual […]

The High Court was therefore not justified in assuming jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to terminate the trial process initiated by law. In essence, the High Court saw its role not as a second trial court to weigh the evidence, but as a judicial gatekeeper, finding that the threshold for exercising its quashing power had not been met because the charges were supported by prima facie material.

It must be noted that, to be a culprit of such heinous crime, destroying lives of minors and killing their souls, Court initiated a Sou Moto Appeal to enhance the sentence of A2, i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.443 of 2005.

It must be noted that, to be a culprit of such heinous crime, destroying lives of minors and killing their souls, Court initiated a Sou Moto Appeal to enhance the sentence of A2, i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.443 of 2005.