Part 1 Part 2 Document Evidence: High Court observed the photographs and found that all the photographs are not only nude photographs, but they are also dirty nude photographs, exposing various types of perversity. They are of various unnatural activities, which are prohibited by the provisions of Section 377 of IPC. The evidence shows that […]
When a Couple Turned Rape into Business: Full Analysis of Child Porn Case (Gujarat HC, 2010): Part 2
Part 1 Thrilling Story of crime: The Secret Operation of A1 and A2 The heart of this criminal enterprise was a flat in Permeshawar Park Society, Ahmedabad, where Accused No. 1 (A1) and Accused No. 2 (A2) resided between 1988 and 1992. A1 and A2, a husband and wife, ran a clandestine operation involving sexual […]
Memes of Prime Minister of India
The High Court was therefore not justified in assuming jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to terminate the trial process initiated by law. In essence, the High Court saw its role not as a second trial court to weigh the evidence, but as a judicial gatekeeper, finding that the threshold for exercising its quashing power had not been met because the charges were supported by prima facie material.
When a Couple Turned Rape into Business: Full Analysis of Child Porn Case (Gujarat HC, 2010): Part 1
It must be noted that, to be a culprit of such heinous crime, destroying lives of minors and killing their souls, Court initiated a Sou Moto Appeal to enhance the sentence of A2, i.e. Criminal Revision Application No.443 of 2005.
Obscene video of Mansya Kalan, District Hathras: Part 1
Sections 191 (Rioting), 115 (Voluntarily causing hurt), 352 (Intentional insult), 351 (Criminal intimidation), 126 (Wrongful restraint), 78 (Stalking), and 137 (Kidnapping). The judgment also discussed Sections 80 (Dowry death), 103 (Murder), and 86 (Cruelty by husband) in the context of judicial precedents.
संविधान सभा की बैठक – 9.12.1946 भाग 1
[1] Constituent Assembly Of India Debates (Proceedings)- Volume I Dt. 9.12.1946 [2] भारत में ब्रिटीश साम्राज्य का प्रभाव और उपनिवेशवाद, कौशल सिंह भाटी, November – December 2024 IJIRMPS | ISSN: 2349-7300, Volume 12 Issue 6 [3] Constituent Assembly Of India Debates (Proceedings)- Volume I Dt. 9.12.1946 [4] Ibid
AMASRA: 2.64 Section 39. Repeals and savings.
2.64 Repeals and savings 2.64.1 Bare Act Provision: 39. Repeals and savings.―(1) The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), and section 126 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (37 of 1956), are hereby repealed. (2) The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 (7 of […]
AMASRA: 2.63 Section 38. Power to make rule.
2.63 Power to make rule 2.63.1 Bare Act Provision: 38. Power to make rule.―(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette and subject to the condition of previous publication, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act. (2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, […]
AMASRA: 2.60 Section 35B. Identification of unauthorised constructions on or after 16th June, 1992.
2.60 Identification of unauthorised constructions on or after 16th June, 1992: 2.60.1 Bare Act Provision: 35B. Identification of unauthorised constructions on or after 16th June, 1992.―(1) The Director-General shall, within such time as may be specified by the Central Government, identify or cause to be identified, all constructions (of whatever nature) made on and after […]
AMASRA: 2.59 Section 35A. Obligation to survey the protected prohibited area and regulated areas.
2.59 Obligation to survey the protected prohibited area and regulated areas 2.59.1 Bare Act Provision: 1[35A. Obligation to survey the protected prohibited area and regulated areas.―(1) The Director-General shall, within such time as may be specified by the Central Government, conduct a survey or cause survey to be conducted in respect of all prohibited areas […]